Tag Archive | "Datuk V.K. Lingam"

Lingam video clip: Commission’s report: ACA asked to reopen Lingam, Eusoff case

Tags: , , , ,


A 1994 photograph showing Datuk V.K. Lingam and Tun Mohd Eusoff Chin and their families on holiday in New Zealand.
A 1994 photograph showing Datuk V.K. Lingam and Tun Mohd Eusoff Chin and their families on holiday in New Zealand.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Royal Commission of Inquiry has recommended that the Anti-Corruption Agency reopen investigations into the relationship between former chief justice Tun Mohd Eusoff Chin and lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam.

Eusoff Chin (left) and V.K. Lingam fishing while on vacation in New Zealand in December 1994.
Flashback: Eusoff Chin (left) and V.K. Lingam fishing while on vacation in New Zealand in December 1994.
insidepix2
 

In particular, it wants the ACA to look into the holiday that the two and their families took at the same time in New Zealand in December 1994.

It also recommended that the ACA investigate a number of other judges who received gifts from Lingam.

The commission noted that an earlier investigation into Eusoff’s holiday with Lingam was said to have been closed by former attorney-general Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah.

It said the case should be reopened following fresh allegations made under oath by witnesses G. Jayanti and V. Thirunama Karasu during the inquiry.

“Fresh investigations should be invoked because they constitute such a horrific imputation of impropriety against Eusoff and a few other judges that public confidence not only in the judiciary but also in the integrity of the ACA will be compromised unless some positive action is seen to be taken,” the report said.

Thirunama is Lingam’s younger brother while Jayanti is his former secretary.

Thirunama had lodged a report in 1998 alleging corruption involving judges, including Eusoff.

He stated that he had sent several gifts from his brother Lingam to several judges.

A sustained attempt was made to cast doubts on Thirunama’s sanity in the inquiry but the commission noted the witness had an “elephantine memory for dates and events”.

“In the case of Jayanti, her motives were impugned. But we thought she was a credible witness,” it said.

Jayanti had testified that she made holiday arrangements for Lingam’s and Eusoff’s families to New Zealand in December 1994.

The report said the trip was “rather startling” because there was evidence that Eusoff and his family had spent almost the entire holiday with Lingam and his family.

Eusoff had testified that he and his family had “bumped” into Lingam and his family at Changi Airport, Singapore, while on their way to New Zealand.

It was revealed in evidence they were together most of the time while holidaying there but, when asked about this, Eusoff merely said they were all coincidences.

“Given the amazing number of alleged coincidences, we need no more than mere common sense to detect the incredulity of that proposition.”

The report said evidence had been led through Eusoff and Lingam to portray Jayanti as unreliable and having an axe to grind.

“Having looked at the demeanour of Jayanti giving evidence and taking into account her evidence in totality, it is more probable that the trip was pre-planned.”

The commission said the intent of the report in respect of the fixing of judicial appointments and promotions was “not merely to treat the patient but to eradicate the disease”.
o
“In other words, a determined effort must be made to get to the root of the malaise which has been uncovered,” it added.

 

Article source:

 

The New Straits Times

 

Article s

Share/Save/Bookmark

COMMISSION’S REPORT: Dr Mahathir: Charge me, I want my day in court

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad says he welcomes any investigations into the allegations
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad says he welcomes any investigations into the allegations

JOHOR BARU: Former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he would not settle for less than his day in court so that he could defend himself against allegations he was at the centre of a judicial appointments scandal in 2001.

He hoped that when investigations into the conspiracy were completed, which also involved a lawyer, a tycoon and a former minister, he would be charged.

Dr Mahathir said he would then reveal what really went on behind the scenes at the time, including instances of judges lobbying him for promotions.

He told a press conference here he did not want the probe to end with the authorities concluding “there is no case” against him.

“Because people will then think that I lobbied to get off. Put me in court and let me explain.

“I don’t believe I did anything wrong but if they feel that I am guilty, I will accept any punishment.

“I welcome any investigations against me. I only ask that they charge me in court and I hope that the judge will allow me to speak,” Dr Mahathir said after attending a seminar here on the results of the 12th general election.

In January, the former prime minister had also promised full co-operation with the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Lingam video clip, but his answers turned out to be less than forthcoming.

He told the commission he was not answerable in his prerogative to appoint superior court judges and could not remember important details behind his decision-making.

Dr Mahathir was responding to the publicising of the commission’s report, and the government’s decision to begin investigations into the six figures named for conspiring to fix the appointments and promotions of judges.

Aside from Dr Mahathir, the others are lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam, former chief justices Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim and Tun Eusoff Chin, tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan and former tourism minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor.

The commission said “there was an insidious movement by Lingam with the assistance of his close friends, Tan and Tengku Adnan, to involve themselves actively in the appointment of judges”.

Dr Mahathir said that despite lobbying from certain judges, he decided on appointments based on his assessments of the candidates.

“It was not just judges who lobbied. People lobbied to be ministers and election candidates. I listened to them but I made my own decisions. I did not know lobbying was a crime.

“I also did not want to be a postman, where the chief justice hands me a recommendation for a judge and I hand it over to the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong.

“I would also scrutinise the candidate and if I found that he was not capable, I would not support his appointment.”

Dr Mahathir was here to continue his campaign to oust Prime Minister and Umno president Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Growing increasingly strident as support for a rebellion against Abdullah ebbs, Dr Mahathir accused party chiefs who backed the incumbent of being “traitors” to the Malay community.

 

Article source:

 

The New Straits Times

Share/Save/Bookmark

Site Sponsors

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Your Ads Here

Add to Technorati Favorites

Calendar

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Authors

Voice of Malaysian

↑ Grab this Headline Animator